Re: about draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-01.txt (issue 40)

Francis Dupont wrote:

>   I think we have a pending milestone change coming in any
>   case. E.g., what's the timeplan and interest for reduced
>   tunnel overhead and pfkey work? Should the transport doc
>   be in the milestones?
>   
>   I see the SCTP support as one of the use cases in the
>   charter, along with the main use case of roaming VPN
>   users. My understanding has been that we are not
>   required to cover everything that we need to do in
>   one document.
>
>=> so the issue is "closed" only for the current document?
>  
>
Right.

--Jari