Re: [nemo] WG: new I-D on HA filtering

Thierry Ernst wrote:

>> > In NEMO Basic Support, one issue we already have is how to select the
>> > interface/CoA at the MR. It would probably be useful that 
>> > the MNN kind
>> > of interact with the MR (to exchange policies, for 
>> > instance), and this
>> > doesn't break the NEMO "Mobility Transparency to MNNs". 
>>
>>=> I completely agree, but this seems to be quite 
>>a separate issue from the binding cache manipulation
>>in the CN/HA. I thought about this problem for nemo
>>but didn't think people would be interested in it. 
>>I think it's needed but basically it would belong
>>to the "policy" bullet in my previous mail. 
>>So you could envision a MIP solution for binding cache
>>manipulation which can be used by MNs and MRs.
>>At the same time, NEMO could develop a solution that
>>runs between nemo-aware MNNs and MRs to set specific
>>policies for each nemo-aware MNN. 
>>    
>>
>
>I perfectly agree. However, I tend to think the same people would be
>involved so it would make sense to do all at once, being in 2 separate
>documents. Let's see what other people say on the ML, including MIPv6
>(or whatever) chairs.
>
>Thierry
>  
>
Agree. Having a standard document in mipv6 and then write another one in 
NEMO if needed to describe how to use (or even enhance if necessary) 
multiple bindings from mipv6

Nicolas