Re: [mobile-ip] Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-tsirtsis-dsmip-problem-0 0.txt
Alain Durand <Alain.Durand=UdXhSnd/[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:18:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.mobileip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 01:48 AM, Tsirtsis George wrote: > Now, when the mobile is not at home but in some other network, there > is an > issue about what kind of v4/v6 support there is in the foreign > network. The > nice thing about Mobile IP is that it is based on tunnels and thus it > provides natural way of tunneling over networks that are not > compatible with > the mobile ...if only Mobile IP could configure v4 over v6 and v6 over > v4 > tunnels (as opposed to just v4 over v4 and v6 over v6 tunnels). A dual > stack > mobile in a v4 only foreign network would then be able to create a > v4&v6 > over v4 (forward and reverse) tunnel with its HA and thus maintain all > its > connectivity. Call me skeptic, but I am a little concern with the potential effect of double or even worse triple tunneling: Mipv6/Ipv6/Mipv4/IPv4 and I'm sure we could build scenarios even more frightening with various combination of encapsulation. I'm not worried about MTU, but about RTT and debugging. - Alain.