AW: AW: AW: [nemo] WG: new I-D on HA filtering

 
> > If we consider multiple CoAs, we SHOULD think how HA or CN
> > forward traffic to different CoAs of MN. Then, we can apply
> filters/policies for this
> > purpose. For ex, MIPv4 considers simultaneous bindings, but no body (as
> far
> > as I know) uses that concept (Enabling s bit in Registration Request),
> since
> > it leads to duplicate traffic to all active point of attachment.
> 
> And as far as I am aware, there is an intent to deprecate the "S" bit as
> RFC3344 is progressed to DS.
> 
> -Basavaraj

Could you please let us know why S bit is being considered for removal? Is
it simply because of no implementations or some other reason?

Regards
Koojana