RE: [mobile-ip] Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-tsirtsis-dsmip-problem-0 0.txt

 > >  > So, it seems pretty reasonable to expect many (most?) 
 > > 
 > > => More like "none" than "most". Even if they implement
 > > it, the encapsulation is normally done in the FA otherwise
 > > the local domain's ingress filter will drop the packets.
 > 
 > Have you even ever deployed MIPv4?  MN would encapsulate 
 > packets using its
 > care-of address, and local domain's ingress filter would 
 > certainly NOT
 > drop those packets.  Or what are you referring to?

=> Have you read RFC 3220? Which CoA are you referring to?
When you have an FA (almost always) the MN doesn't get a 
colocated CoA. Please read 3220.

And yes I've worked with MIP (v4 and v6) for some time...

I won't comment on the rest of the mail because there is
obviously some fundamental misunderstanding of MIPv4.

Hesham