RE: [Mip6] Comment on MIPv6 I-D
Soohong Daniel Park <[email protected]> Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:54:14 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobileip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <016701c38a22$cbcf0890$b7cbdba8@daniel> |
One more editorial: P 71 o The node MUST be able validate a Home Address option using an existing Binding Cache entry, as described in Section 9.3.1. s/be able/be able to...:-) Soohong Daniel Park @SAMSUNG.COM > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Frank Quick > Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 1:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Mip6] Comment on MIPv6 I-D > > > In section 10.3.1: > > "To begin processing the Binding Update, the home agent MUST > perform the > following sequence of tests: > > ... > > o A Home Address destination option MUST be present in > the message. > > ..." > > 11.7.1 says essentially the same thing on page 131: > > " o The packet MUST contain a Home Address destination > option, giving > the mobile node's home address for the binding." > > > This seems to moot some of the text in 11.7.1, page 132: > > "The mobile node MUST use its home address - either in the > Home Address > destination option or in the Source Address field of the > IPv6 header - in > Binding Updates sent to the home agent." > > This sentence implies that the node has the option of > EITHER/OR whereas the > preceding text would say the node MUST include the Home > Address destination > option, and (presumably) MAY also use the home address as the Source > Address. I'd suggest that this sentence be deleted, or > amended to reflect > the fact that the home address as Source Address is allowed but the > destination option is mandatory. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mip6 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6 >