Re: Is route optimization for MIPv4 dead?
Henrik Levkowetz <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:51:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobileip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Signature=_Thu__23_Oct_2003_14_51_08_+0200_MHRNNixL9uGkH3=+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Ron, Route optimization is not on the charter for the Mobile IP v4 working group (mip4). To my knowledge, it is not being worked on outside the working group, either. If you want to follow mip4 issues, you should participate on the mip4 mailing list (You can subscribe here: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4). This list ([email protected]) will be shut down soon. Henrik On Thursday, 23 Oct 2003, Ron wrote: > Sorry for posting a basic question. > I know that in the RFC 3344 (IP Mobility Support for IPv4) there is no > consideration of route optimization, which was once an I-D in this WG. > Is it forgotten now, or is someone undergoing an effort to improve it? > Thanks in advance. --Signature=_Thu__23_Oct_2003_14_51_08_+0200_MHRNNixL9uGkH3=+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/l868eVhrtTJkXCMRAtMWAKDF5RWDoptJbXb9AKt23Hl0ubFucwCg8Moy v0qCTbOxbcuKowY+XSjTpy0= =3nrD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__23_Oct_2003_14_51_08_+0200_MHRNNixL9uGkH3=+--