Re: [IPv6] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM abbreviations
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf-SWp7JaYWvAQV+D8aMU/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opsawg,gmane.ietf.mpls,gmane.ietf.ipv6,gmane.ietf.ippm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7381.1702476819@localhost> |
Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > - Do you see the benefit of introducing two new abbreviations for > in-band OAM and out-of-band OAM? Yes. > - Which set of abbreviations > (iOAM/oOAM vs. inb-OAM/oob-OAM) do you prefer for being used in IETF? > - Or would you propose another set of abbreviations? inb-OAM, oob-OAM. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF-SWp7JaYWvAQV+D8aMU/[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmV5vBMWHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZcFUB/44GK9FtXebBZY0vlVwo6jS3vwt 7Mid0aTWP5Em+4KyovElzwfYm+y3njK51hscIj2v7rbt15udWAg2uCE4opADRIWn 6z1tUF75IG2yIBR3wkcgrN/+iDZwv3tq3kDPgcjuXPvoRvDumrrjIz/yPCiZqzpL vGyImug74Gm5qRWR2zjgjBpfP+YUtdLzsgGgPR5jXiz/R8nxv4IHM4fkaWt9Wiby n7QIaj7hiJTxZf7qoCYPzZI7+ZR5mLOCra3zVKllLhWpGkKCcKYvoh+cAsIE/vX4 WrFIsGsdZOIkXlzsU4C+YU1jIL0TUVKl5spgNHFW36gytBg+L5j31BauB+Jh =fDwj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----