Re: [IPv6] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM abbreviations
Bob Hinden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ippm,gmane.ietf.mpls,gmane.ietf.ipv6,gmane.ietf.opsawg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greg, With my 6MAN hat on very loosely, I don’t think this discussion needs to be on the IPV6 list. Bob > On Dec 12, 2023, at 7:13 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear All, > Loa and I have discussed these abbreviations to help us find a solution that avoids the confusion we found when we came across them. Firstly, what they stand for: > IOAM - In-situ OAM (RFC 9197 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9197/>) > iOAM - in-band OAM (RAW architecture <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-raw-architecture-13>) > oOAM - out-of-band OAM (RAW architecture <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-raw-architecture-13>) > We discussed the issue with Pascal and came to slightly different abbreviations for the last two: > inb-OAM > oob-OAM > We also discord these abbreviations with the RFC Editor. Resulting from that, RFC Editor agreed to add IOAM to the RFC Editor Abbreviation List <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt>. The other two abbreviations cannot be added at this time. If that is needed, we can ask the RFC Editor to add them once the respective RFC is published. > We are seeking your feedback on the following: > Do you see the benefit of introducing two new abbreviations for in-band OAM and out-of-band OAM? > Which set of abbreviations (iOAM/oOAM vs. inb-OAM/oob-OAM) do you prefer for being used in IETF? > Or would you propose another set of abbreviations? > Regards, > Loa and Greg > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEm0rfRsOCoyamPexGrut0EXfnu6gFAmV6N1UACgkQrut0EXfn u6jdUQf+KCTc6VrubmrpKU1HTcvaZ2pnvEM2M+sIPnJB4s4NzSeLd3MNqMor1U/w rIccUzTFA1Y0K8Bjd4aGAnz0LpezTI8G7r39c6NAzRtoPoRdOipBCs6ox0uWqw3U zfnRAA2xDY2rJJu0ZIVl4QGFz8c+eipAepo5dQThZmMZbhN6IEhZdkX1X6jU0XKM BzfhRXLukmvhuzHmzMA1u4LoEnaft6S+aJ35Y4QUR0uyxxULiyoPh4SKuo09OkkM SKlKi7D7L7H0AC4dh7hCWTbV5m7kaMJ3lpPxSWcbj6GtulQd0W04K+1bYk2nZRK6 Tj9TZvIBujxUkkY6j2yLVV44haW3Bw== =wkLO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----