MSDP vs. MBGP end-point
Jay Ford <[email protected]> Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:53:57 -0500 (CDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.msdp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.A41.4.31.0208051050200.26636-100000@handlebar.weeg.uiowa.edu> |
I received the following response from a prospective multicast peer after providing my MSDP end-point which is not my MBGP end-point. > for proper MSDP functionality, the MSDP peer endpoints should always be the > MBGP peer endpoints. If this is not done, the majority of loop prevention > in MSDP (a flooding protocol) is reduced. (essentially, for proper deployment, > there should be 1 msdp session for every mbgp session, since msdp uses bgp > for topology information, since it has no topology information itself) Comments? ________________________________________________________________________ Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Technology Services University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 email: [email protected], phone: 319-335-5555, fax: 319-335-2951