MSDP vs. MBGP end-point

Jay Ford <[email protected]> Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:53:57 -0500 (CDT)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.msdp
Message-ID <Pine.A41.4.31.0208051050200.26636-100000@handlebar.weeg.uiowa.edu>
I received the following response from a prospective multicast peer after
providing my MSDP end-point which is not my MBGP end-point.

> for proper MSDP functionality, the MSDP peer endpoints should always be the
> MBGP peer endpoints. If this is not done, the majority of loop prevention
> in MSDP (a flooding protocol) is reduced. (essentially, for proper deployment,
> there should be 1 msdp session for every mbgp session, since msdp uses bgp
> for topology information, since it has no topology information itself)

Comments?

________________________________________________________________________
Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Technology Services
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
email: [email protected], phone: 319-335-5555, fax: 319-335-2951