Re: MSDP spec 14

Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Nov 2002 05:47:15 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.msdp,gmane.ietf.mboned
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:37:53PM +0800, Guo Feng wrote:
> Two questions:
> 
> 1.Why is the notification TLV removed ?

Because it is not supported in all of the existing implementations
and operational practice in the current deployed Internets MSDP
infrastructure seem to have shown that that is not a mayor loss -
aka: the notification TLVs do not seem to be urgently required to
interoperate MSDP.

> 2.There are no description about Request and Response TLV Function , will
> those two TLVs be obsolete ?

None of the things removed from the spec are obsolete, they are
just not part of the MSP spec anymore: We have circled for several years
around the approach to make a short term solution as good as possible and
did not get anywhere. Now we have changed the goal to only include
what can considered to be minimally needed to interoperate MSDP
and to provide a base functionality that has shown to be implemented
by the majority of implementations available and deployed.

If a vendor wants to provide this or any other function that at one point
in time was (or was not) in the MSDP spec, then he simply adds it to his
implementation. He only need to figure out then how to keep his implementation
interoperable with the base of MSDP which is specified in the MSDP spec.
There are lots of possibilities on how to do this.

Cheers
	Toerless
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Meyer" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 5:52 AM
> Subject: Re: MSDP spec 14
> 
> 
> > >> As discussed today in mboned wg:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-msdp-spec-14.txt
> > >>
> >
> > Folks, this is the official start of the WG Last call on this
> > document. Comments to the list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks
   Toerless Eckert