Re: mboned: MSDP MIB

On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:43:17AM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
> 	Folks,
> 
> 	In our never-ending quest to close the MSDP working
> 	group, we've come up against the question of what to do
> 	with the MSDP MIB (in particular, where to finish
> 	it). The current thinking is to close the MSDP WG and
> 	finish the MIB in MBONED.  
> 	
> 	Please speak up now if you have issues or concerns about
> 	this approach.

Why wouldn't the same principles that had us move MSDP to MBONED also
move the MIB to MBONED ? Eg: A MIB by itself even for any other
protocol might already have a slight tendency on it's own to be reviewed
by MBONED (because in MAGMA/PIM you may not be too much concerned about
operational issues), the MIB of a protocol itself is all about
operational issues.

Aeh, i think i wanted to say "Vote YES for MBONED" ;-)

Cheers
	TOerless
_______________________________________________________________
user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned.html
web archive:  http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned/