Re: Comments on draft-ietf-msgtrk-mtqp-03.txt

> Ned, care to make a specific recommendation?

> I see these options:

>     o	punt -- don't specify a registry at all. This is the same
> 	thing that RFCs 2806 (tel URL), 2848 (PINT) and 3028 (sieve)
> 	do. They all specify the same type of vendor trees, but do NOT
> 	specify any registry for the list.

>     o	go with reverse domain names

I guess I slightly prefer punting, but either one of these seems fine to me.

				Ned