Re: msgtrk: MTQP, TLS, & SRV
Lawrence Greenfield <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:03:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.msgtrk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:00:17 -0800 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], Tony Hansen <[email protected]> leg+> Regardless, MTQP needs to specify what certificate name needs to be leg+> sent. Why "regardless"? If it is solved in the TLS protocol, why duplicate it in the MTQP protocol? Or are you assuming it will never be solved by the TLS protocol? The multi-homed server problem can be solved in the TLS protocol. What name the client expects cannot. I do a SRV look on _mtqp._tcp.smtp3.example.com and get back msgtrk.example.com, port 4530. I connect to msgtrk.example.com 4530, and issue STARTTLS. What certificate name should I expect? (In a future TLS protocol, what certificate name should I request?) "smtp3.example.com" might not be a great choice: that certificate name may already be in use on a different machine. "msgtrk.example.com" is definitely wrong---I received it from the insecure DNS system. "_mtqp._tcp.smtp3.example.com" makes some sense but is kinda ugly. You can see the LDAP SRV discussion on ldapext for more on this. Larry