RE: Has IANA gone mad?

> Yes, well, I've passed your concern about this on in the 
> past. The response was
> to add a link at the top of the IESG Activities/Actions page, 
> the logic being
> that the status tracker is an IESG entity. (I note that a 
> link to the RFC
> Editor queue appears in a similar position under the "RFC 
> Pages" link.) I
> personally would prefer to have a link on the main IETF page 
> but nobody else
> seems to think this is appropriate.

FWIW there's now a link on the Internet-Drafts page:

http://www.ietf.org/ID.html

-Scott-