Re: MSGTRK Closing

I feel it should remain open. If message tracking takes off, then we 
will need the mailing list for possible subsequent work.

	Tony Hansen
	[email protected]

Scott Hollenbeck wrote:

> The four MSGTRK RFCs were announced yesterday.  That being done, the working
> group will be closed shortly.
> 
> No one expressed any opinions on keeping this mailing list open or closing
> it.  Speak NOW if you have an opinion, because I need to tell the IETF
> Secretariat if the list will remain when the group is closed.  Since closing
> the list requires explicit action, I am going to assume that a lack of
> opinion or explicit action to close the list means that it should remain
> open.
> 
> -Scott-
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Scott Hollenbeck [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:31 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: MSGTRK Closing
>>
>>
>>
>>All:
>>
>>The msgtrk documents are now in RFC Editor "auth48" status.  
>>That means that
>>they are in the final stage of review before being published 
>>as RFCs.  That
>>being the case, I intend to close the working group after the RFCs are
>>announced.  Speak now if you believe there is any reason to 
>>*not* close.
>>
>>The working group mailing list can remain open once the group 
>>has closed.
>>You all can decide to close the list if you wish to do so, 
>>but there's no
>>harm (and there's often benefit) in leaving the list open 
>>after a group has
>>been closed.
>>
>>Congratulations on a job almost completed!
>>
>>-Scott-
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
>