simple problem statement
Dave Kristol <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Dec 1998 12:02:05 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.msgtrk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The WG session in Orlando was largely a rehash of the BOF session in Chicago. I had the following summary in my notes from Chicago, and I thought they might help the folks who will be revising the WG charter, problem statement, and requirements document. Dave Kristol ======================== How do you turn tracking on? If it's always on, there's a considerable cost throughout the network to track messages that no one may ever ask about. If you have to turn tracking on explicitly, which is much less resource-intensive, you'll probably always discover that you haven't asked for tracking for the message that got lost and that you therefore needed to track. When do you find out what happened? Is notification about the disposition of a message automatic, or do you have to ask what happened to it? In the latter case, how long should the tracking information be retained? (How much later can you ask about a message?) Whom do you ask? What is the protocol for querying about the disposition of a message? At what points along the message's delivery path can you get tracking information? (Can you query the hops within a company's internal email system?) Who is allowed to ask? What security is in place to ensure that only authorized parties can ask about the disposition of a message? How do you authenticate their identity?