Re: Proposal for the interactive message tracking protocol
Tomorrow SystemsInc <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 1999 07:00:15 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.msgtrk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think this idea is a good one. In order to trace the complete path of a message, a "management station" will go from MTA to MTA to MTA, piecing the information together as it goes. This is a lot like the model for classic network management, where each "agent" is independent and aggregate staticstics about the network must be deduced from information returned from multiple agents. As far as the following goes: >There might be an issue > with handing back > response data like this in SMTP in that it would be > somewhat larger than > your average SMTP response. At what point does this apply ? Do you mean during the setup phase of an SMTP session only ? MTAs pass some very large messages, so the overhead of the message tracking response is probably about the same as a message unless there is a protocol-specific state where MTAs traditionally don't want to see a "larger than average SMTP response" as you describe above. Otherwise, what is the anticipated ratio of message tracking requests versus normal message traffic ? Is there a class of user who will want to saturate and MTA with message tracking requests ? Gordon ===== Gordon Jones Tomorrow Systems Incorporated Internet Consulting - Internet Software http://www.tomorrowsys.com (703) 309 - 8859 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com