Re: SIEVE WG Status
Stephan Bosch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 22-6-2011 19:54, Ned Freed schreef: > > The base Sieve language may not have these constructs (and IMO should > not), but > that doesn't mean they haven't been defined. See RFC 5784. Damn, now why did I miss this part? Yes, RFC 5784 pretty much covers most of the issue. Apparently, it has been a while since I last read this. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Stephan. _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve