Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-sieve-convert-03.txt

Barry Leiba <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mta-filters
Message-ID <CAC4RtVD08JeKHmkQWjArhxWjttv=78q1oRg7MwQgueUHFOBxqw@mail.gmail.com>
>> So I'm looking for others to weigh in.  Do you prefer the action to be
>> taken along with the test?  Or do you prefer having to repeat the text, once
>> for the test and again to do the action?
>
> I'd like the test to have the action side-effect.  That is indeed also what
> I understood from your initial query. I agree that first testing and then
> performing the action is much of a hassle, both for the implementer of the
> Sieve interpreter and the Sieve script author.

Any others?  Cyrus, I understood you to agree that the testable action
mechanism was reasonable.  Is that right?  Others?  Once we resolve
this, I'll post an -04 (with Hannah's correction, at least) that we
can send to the IESG.  Everyone, comment, please.

Barry
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.