Re: Working group last call on draft-ietf-sieve-include
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aaron Stone wrote: >Nits included in my -11. Question below about naming. > >On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Alexey Melnikov ><[email protected]> wrote: > > >>Also, I think this requirement makes [RFC5804] Normative. >> >>And finally, why is this not a MUST? Making a SHOULD level requirement seems >>a bit weak in this case. >> > >Is it normative even without the MUST (i.e. if I leave it as RECOMMENDED)? > Yes. >In the case of a MUST, it means that a valid includes implementation >imposes a script naming restriction. If a site isn't using >managesieve, would that site really need to accept the name >restrictions? > If you don't make it a MUST, then nobody can be relied upon the rule. >I'm comfortable either way. > _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve