Re: About editheader
Stephan Bosch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/27/2011 5:18 AM, Ned Freed wrote: >> Also, it is not really >> possible to short-circuit the 'test' as required in RFC 5229 Section >> 3.2, because all matching headers must be deleted and thus matching >> continues. > > Short-circuiting simply means you're supposed to stop as soon as > possible and > retain the last match. It's a moot statement when there's no stopping > condition as with deleteheader, so I see no real conflict. Yeah, now that you explain it like that, I agree. My main concern is consensus anyway. [...] >> Or am I just exaggerating this problem? > > Yes, I'd have to say that you are. And, apparently you're not the only one. Well, it's a good thing anyway; saves me quite a bit of work. ;) Thanks! Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve