Re: Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sieve-include-13
Aaron Stone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters,gmane.ietf.gen-art |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEdAYKWuHgqNE5NOLgsYUXAF0HgMEqEgKiPyGCjiAkF627XkMw@mail.gmail.com> |
Great comments, thank you! Cheers, Aaron On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-sieve-include-13 > Reviewer: Ben Campbell > Review Date: 2011-12-13 > IETF LC End Date: 2011-12-15 > > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a proposed standard > > Major issues: > > None > > Minor issues: > > -- section 3.1, paragraph 4: "Implementations MUST NOT generate errors for > recursive inclusions at upload time, as this would force an upload ordering > requirement upon script authors / generators. However, if an active script > is replaced with a faulty script and would remain the active script, an > error MUST be generated and the upload MUST fail." > > These two statements seem contradictory on a quick reading. In > particular, how can the latter assertion avoid an upload ordering > requirement? Or do you mean faulty in some way other than being recursive? > > -- section 3.4.1, paragraph 5: "If a "global" command is given the name of > a variable that has previously been defined in the immediate script with > "set", an error MUST be generated either when the script is uploaded or at > execution time." > > Does this conflict with the previous statement that it is okay for a > global and a private variable to have the same name? > > -- section 3.4.2: > > Why do you need two ways to accomplish the same thing? > > Does the global namespace have the same "requires" requirement as the > global command? > > -- section 4.2, paragraph 2: > > Can you elaborate on what permissions are proper? Is it different for an > included script than for any other script? > > -- section 4.2, paragraph 3: > > Can you elaborate on what you mean by "safe for a storage system"? > > Nits/editorial comments: > > -- section 3.1, paragraph 4: "authors / generators" > > s/ "authors / generators " / "authors and generators" > > -- section 3.2, paragraph 9 (Top of page 6): " > The included script MUST be a valid Sieve script. Each script MUST > have its own "require" statements for all optional capabilities used > by that script. " > > Who do these normative statements apply to? As worded, it sounds like they > apply to the user. It might be better to say that the implementation MUST > validate that… > > -- section 3.4.2, paragraph 3: "Variables declared global and variables > accessed via the global namespace MUST be one and the same." > > Plurality mismatch. I suggest something like "a variable declared as > global and a variable accesses with the global namespace, otherwise having > the same name…" > > -- section 5: > > Please explicitly mention the name or URL of the registry table to which > this should be added. > > > _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve