Re: IPR Disclosures on draft-ietf-sieve-include and draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Cyrus Daboo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Arnt,
>
>
> --On December 18, 2011 11:07:53 PM +0100 Arnt Gulbrandsen <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  But please allow another month or so to pass before publishing the RFCs.
>> Just in case someone's not reading mail and has something significant to
>> say.
>>
>
> This is a legal matter that may require proper legal review be undertaken
> by implementers' organizations. Given the timing of this, with the upcoming
> holidays, and the fact that, in my experience, legal issues often take
> longer than one expects to be resolved, I do think we need to delay the
> documents sufficiently to account for that. My preference is for a last
> call that finishes at the end of January 2012. I don't mind whether that is
> a WG or IETF last call, though I am tempted to suggest this should go to
> the IETF as a whole.


January sounds right to me, and I'm thinking an IETF LC is better. We'll
announce it of course on the WG list, but because the primary reason for
the call is a legal / organizational impact rather than a technical one, we
might not be as well equipped within the WG to comment with respect to the
layer 8 and 9 issues.

Cheers,
Aaron

_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve