Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sieve-convert-06.txt
Stephan Bosch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/1/2011 6:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Sieve Mail Filtering Language Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Sieve Extension for Converting Messages Before Delivery > Author(s) : Alexey Melnikov > Qian Sun > Barry Leiba > Kepeng Li > Filename : draft-ietf-sieve-convert-06.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2011-12-01 I was just reading this specification again for some example text, and I noticed a small issue. This nit is about the following requirement from Section 6 of RFC 5228 (Sieve): Extensions MUST state how they interact with constraints defined in section 2.10, e.g., whether they cancel the implicit keep, and which actions they are compatible and incompatible with. The latter part of this requirement is obviously explicitly met in Section 2.1. However, I miss an explicit statement about whether or not the new "convert" action cancels the implicit keep. Although it should be quite obvious and the examples provide various hints in the correct direction, I think an explicit sentence is in order. For example, I did find this for both new actions defined in the editheader specification (RFC5293), e.g. `The addheader action does not affect Sieve's implicit keep.' I think the situation is very similar in this case. Regards, Stephan. _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve