Re: [sieve] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sieve-include-13

On Jan 13, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:

[…]

> 
> I think this isn't a protocol requirement, but a
> quality-of-implementation issue.  But I do think the document could
> have a paragraph discussing this, and warning of the consequences.

I concur that this is not so much a protocol issue as a documentation issue. I did not mean to imply things were broken; just that I found the intent to be unclear. I think such a paragraph would likely solve the issue.


Thanks!

Ben.