Re: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-08.txt> (Sieve Notification Mechanism: SIP MESSAGE) to Proposed Standard
SM <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Cyrus, At 13:42 26-01-2012, Cyrus Daboo wrote: >There is feedback along those lines on the SIEVE WG mailing list. >Please see the thread started by Pete on this issue last year: ><http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve/current/msg05178.html>. >That thread covers all the WG debate on this issue up until the two >recent last calls. That's the "do nothing" alternative. Peter mentioned that it is a bad idea. At 13:44 26-01-2012, Cyrus Daboo wrote: >I was the chair present at that meeting. Apologies for not including >that detail in the minutes. All the meetings I chair include the >Note Well as the second slide in presentations I put together (which >seems to be common practice), and indeed you can see that in the >uploaded slides. Thanks. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve