Re: Fwd: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

I read the draft and it looked good to me. +1


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Alexey Melnikov
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
> Are there people here who can do additional reviews of the draft?
>
> Thank you,
> Alexey
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
> *Date:* 7 May 2013 23:24:30 GMT+01:00
> *To:* IETF Apps Discuss <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* *[apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via
> APPSAWG*
>
> We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG,
> since there is no longer a sieve WG.  It is a relatively short document and
> appears to fall within our charter.
>
> We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone
> through small, tight WGs so far.  Before issuing a formal call for
> adoption, I'd like to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people
> currently following APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and
> constructive commentary.  A virtual show of hands, please?
>
> Alternatively, the ADs may wish to spin up another short-lived WG to
> handle this.  Barry or Pete, care to comment?
>
> -MSK, co-chairin'
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> apps-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sieve mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
>
>

_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve