Re: Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]>wrote:

> We always have a tricky situation when something belongs elsewhere as
> well as on apps-discuss -- this has happened a few times as we've
> branched off discussions (webfinger, json, dmarc), and will also
> happen in cases such as imap and sieve stuff, as we try to bring it
> into appsawg.  I think the best approach is to try to cross-post when
> it's stuff that's relatively low volume (such as this), and to keep
> apps-discuss periodically updated when it's higher volume (such as
> webfinger).
>
> We've now had reviews of this document
>
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate/
>
> ...by Ned Freed, Aaron Stone, and Cyrus Daboo.  Alexey, too, as
> shepherd.  And PSA has expressed approval for handling it in appsawg.
> I've seen no objections, so I think that works for bringing it into
> appsawg.  For review, if we could get a couple of other appsawg folks,
> even some who are not otherwise involved with sieve, to review it as a
> sanity check, we should be OK.  Claudio can help corral a couple of
> reviewers through appsdir.
>
> We might also specifically ask Arnt Gulbrandsen and Tim Showalter for
> reviews, as formerly active Sieve folks.
>

I was hoping for a little more voluntary participation, but if we think we
can grab enough people to make the review process smooth then I'm fine with
proceeding.  I'll contact the authors to submit, and see if Alexey is still
keen to shepherd.

-MSK

_______________________________________________
apps-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss