Re: SPECIAL-USE in Sieve (RFC 6154)
Stephan Bosch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 2-4-2016 om 9:28 schreef Ned Freed: >> Please tell me what you think. I aim to submit this to appsawg soon, but >> I think most Sieve people are still concentrated here, so I post it here >> first. > This looks like a useful addition to sieve to me. I support its adoption as a > draft. Thanks! > One thing you'll need to address is the ability for the same special use > attribute to be attached to multiple mailboxes. Since the ability to have the > same special-use attribute on multiple mailboxes is implementation-specific, my > suggestion would be to make the behavior in this case implementation-specific > as well. Section 4 states the following: "More than one mailbox can have a particular special-use flag assigned. In that case, the mailbox that is chosen for delivery is implementation-defined. However, implementations MUST ensure that this choice is made consistently, so that the same mailbox is used every time." Isn't that what you mean? What is missing? Regards, Stephan. _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve