Re: Sieve deleteheader and :count match type

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mta-filters
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> [email protected] writes:
> > I also don't think that saying that :count tests perform a preliminary count
> > like :index :last is especially useful - can you think of a case where you'd
> > want to delete all headers of a given type based on how many of them are
> > present? I can't.

> It's far-fetched, but deleting both subject fields if there are two or
> more? I think most people choose to use the first. Choosing to delete both
> isn't entirely unreasonable, though.

I don't really see a case for deleting all of them. Deleting all but one
makes a certain amount of sense, but you can't do that directly with
a single deleteheader action.

> The same applies to other header fields that may occur at most once.

Again, all but one, sure, or maybe appending them to each other. But not
full deletion.

				Ned

_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.