Re: Sieve :fcc option
Ken Murchison <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Organization | Carnegie Mellon University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ned, On 01/17/2017 11:42 AM, Ned Freed wrote: >> A vendor that uses Cyrus IMAP has some customers that would like to have >> copies of outgoing Sieve-generated messages (e.g. reject, vacation) >> stored in their Sent mailbox. We could obviously do this with a user >> configurable option, but I was thinking of extending Sieve to support a >> :fcc <mailbox> option on reject, vacation and any new actions where it >> might apply. The option could also leverage >> draft-bosch-sieve-special-use to do something like :fcc "\\Sent" > > I see no problem for notify or vacation, but there's a serious > semantics issue > with reject - when you reject a message you are saying, "I didn't > receive" this > message". If you implement an action where you do in fact receive the > message, > albeit as a part of a DSN, you're essentially lying about what you did. Would you object to allowing :fcc with reject only (and not with ereject), which sends MDNs, and presumably is post-delivery? Or would you still have the same concerns? -- Kenneth Murchison Principal Systems Software Engineer Carnegie Mellon University _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve