Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5229 (5015)
Stan Kalisch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mta-filters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Apologies for the lateness of this reply. > On May 11, 2017, at 3:59 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> wrote: > > on. den 10. 05. 2017 klokka 17.05 (-0700) skreiv RFC Errata System: >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5015 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Stan Kalisch <[email protected]> >> >> Section: 3.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> # Imagine the header >> # Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out >> if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" { >> # will hold "acme-users", >> # will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out" >> fileinfo "INBOX.lists."; stop; >> } >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> # Imagine the header >> # Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out >> if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" { >> # will hold "acme-users", >> # will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out" >> fileinto "INBOX.lists."; stop; >> } >> >> Notes >> ----- >> This suggestion corrects the spelling of the "fileinto" action in the example. > > mea culpa! the fix is correct. > > aside: it is interesting that the mail copy of this notification has > removed the "${1}" and "${2}" from the text. it is correct in the web > version. I noticed the omissions still existed in the emailed notification of the verification of the errata. Does anyone know if the cause of this has been fixed? Stan _______________________________________________ sieve mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve