SEND IDs [Re: Comments on draft-nordmark-multi6-threats-01]

Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Organization IBM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Iljitsch,

> On a related note: the SEND CGA stuff mandates using the subnet prefix 
> in creating the interface identifier and as such makes it impossible to 
> have the same interface identifier in different subnets. I was unable to 
> convince them of the error of their ways and apparently there was no 
> IETF last call or I missed it so now this stupidity is an RFC. We should 
> do our best to make sure there isn't any more of this.

(Co-chair hat is OFF.)

I happen to agree with you and disagree with Christian - there should
be a mode in SEND in which the CGA address is generated without including
the (typically /48) prefix which will vary between ISPs when multihomed.

There was a last call, you missed it, and I raised this point in
private email and lost.

For multi6, I believe we should not feel constrained by this. It would
be a fairly simple extension to SEND to allow this, and it might be
a very valuable functionality vs security tradeoff for a multihomed
site that wanted to run SEND.

    Brian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.