RE: Comments on draft-nordmark-multi6-threats-01

"Fleischman, Eric" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Message-ID <5B58696DB20B9140AD20E0685C573A6404FDD549@xch-nw-09.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Erik,

>      identifier  - an IP layer identifier for an IP layer endpoint
>                    (stack name in [NSRG]).  <snip>

I am bothered by this definition. The way I read it, it implies that an IP layer endpoint is the protocol stack. That is true of every protocol system that I know (including OSI) except for the Internet protocol suite. For the Internet protocol suite, the IP layer endpoint is a network interface. 

Here is where the difference is manifest: for OSI and other protocols with a NSAP (network service access point -- i.e., a stack interface at the network layer), every network interface on that device has the same network layer address. However, for the Internet protocol suite, every network interface has a different IP address. This is why you need to eliminate the text "(stack name in [NSRG])" from your definition.

BTW: has multi6 actually considered redefining IP addresses to actually become stack interfaces at the IP layer? If you have, I think that you may agree with me that most/many of the *node* multihoming problems go away.

--Eric
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.