RE: Comments on draft-nordmark-multi6-threats-01
"Fleischman, Eric" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5B58696DB20B9140AD20E0685C573A6404FDD549@xch-nw-09.nw.nos.boeing.com> |
Erik, > identifier - an IP layer identifier for an IP layer endpoint > (stack name in [NSRG]). <snip> I am bothered by this definition. The way I read it, it implies that an IP layer endpoint is the protocol stack. That is true of every protocol system that I know (including OSI) except for the Internet protocol suite. For the Internet protocol suite, the IP layer endpoint is a network interface. Here is where the difference is manifest: for OSI and other protocols with a NSAP (network service access point -- i.e., a stack interface at the network layer), every network interface on that device has the same network layer address. However, for the Internet protocol suite, every network interface has a different IP address. This is why you need to eliminate the text "(stack name in [NSRG])" from your definition. BTW: has multi6 actually considered redefining IP addresses to actually become stack interfaces at the IP layer? If you have, I think that you may agree with me that most/many of the *node* multihoming problems go away. --Eric