Re: Comments on draft-nordmark-multi6-threats-01

On 11 jun 2004, at 18:13, Erik Nordmark wrote:

>> We can't let ourselves be constrained by arbitrary features of the
>> current architecture. If the features are important, sure, we must
>> support them. But having to do so just because it can be done today
>> makes has the potential to disqualify very useful multihoming 
>> solutions
>> without good reason.

> Is there something in section 8 that you think is placing too strong
> requirements?

Since it uses the word "could" I don't think there is a requirement 
here at all, so I have no problem with it. Also, I think Brian is right 
in saying that site multihoming and anonimity have a low correlation.