Re: draft remarks
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19-jun-04, at 20:35, <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd hesitate explicitly calling out MPLS-TE - there are otherways to > 'manage' a network. I'd make it more general: > 4.2 Does your solution impact existing network management tools and > techniques? [...] > add: > What are the implications for proxies? Hm, this way the document is quickly becoming "list the way your solution interacts with RFCs 1 - 3800". The value of this document is that it reminds authors of issues that may be pertinent to their solution. In order to do this, it's important to offer a rationale for including a question. I see no reason why multi-address multihoming would impact network management or proxies. If you do, it would be good to say why, so authors can determine whether your concerns are warrented.