Re: draft remarks

Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 19-jun-04, at 20:35, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd hesitate explicitly calling out MPLS-TE - there are otherways to
> 'manage' a network.  I'd make it more general:

>  4.2  Does your solution impact existing network management tools and 
> techniques?

[...]

> add:
> 	What are the implications for proxies?

Hm, this way the document is quickly becoming "list the way your 
solution interacts with RFCs 1 - 3800". The value of this document is 
that it reminds authors of issues that may be pertinent to their 
solution. In order to do this, it's important to offer a rationale for 
including a question. I see no reason why multi-address multihoming 
would impact network management or proxies. If you do, it would be good 
to say why, so authors can determine whether your concerns are 
warrented.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.