Re: draft remarks

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 19-jun-04, at 20:35, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I'd hesitate explicitly calling out MPLS-TE - there are otherways to
>> 'manage' a network.  I'd make it more general:
> 
> 
>>  4.2  Does your solution impact existing network management tools and 
>> techniques?
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
>> add:
>>     What are the implications for proxies?
> 
> 
> Hm, this way the document is quickly becoming "list the way your 
> solution interacts with RFCs 1 - 3800". 

Right.  I agree.  We can't predict all pitfalls, but for instance, to 
tie into another message from Iljitsch, perhaps we should point out that 
if a mechanism uses some nifty hack on addressing and someone is doing 
MPLS-TE based on source address, you could have a problem.  On the other 
hand, I'm also perfectly happy removing the question in its entirety.

Eliot