Re: Message from "Jeff Williams" [Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")]

Joe Touch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks. That was what I wanted included in the multi6 archives.

Joe

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Joe,
> 
> Try http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/08030.html
> 
> It's 5 years old; Google might find something more recent if
> you can be bothered. I can't.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> I've come across the posts of many trolls, many of whom waste time. Is 
>> there some reason you believe Jeff Williams is more of a pseudonym 
>> than any of the other trolls?
>>
>> I.e., if you're going to make that accusation (of pseudonym), please 
>> include the reasons for the accusation.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
>>> Joe,
>>>
>>> Nobody has ever traced the person behind "Jeff Williams". I'm
>>> surprised you haven't come across his or her output before.
>>> I make no apology for attempting to prevent him or her
>>> wasting our time, as he or she has wasted time of many other
>>> IETF WGs in the past.
>>>
>>>    Brian
>>>
>>> Joe Touch wrote:
>>>
>>>> Brian,
>>>>
>>>> If someone is posting under a pseudonym, please indicate who you 
>>>> believe the real author is and why.
>>>>
>>>> As to whether to reply, I would prefer that you let the WG decide 
>>>> that for themselves. Blackballing posters is an extreme measure, and 
>>>> shouldn't be done unless absolutely necessary. Besides, trolls are 
>>>> everywhere.
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's interesting that the person who writes under the pseudonym
>>>>> "Jeff Williams" has start sending his or her usual nonsense to
>>>>> the multi6 list. I advise everybody to not waste their time
>>>>> reading messages from "Jeff Williams", and above *do not*
>>>>> respond, because we know from experience that even more
>>>>> nonsense comes back as a result.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Brian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff Williams wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <blah blah blah>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 250 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA2frwE5f5cImnZrsRApu2AKDMHElAZP/dNI67pU+T0Jjd2fO5bgCg7J7A
NUmsXcWt+JpgN+rKiV2CS6k=
=DRJK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.