Re: Message from "Jeff Williams" [Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")]
Joe Touch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks. That was what I wanted included in the multi6 archives. Joe Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Joe, > > Try http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/08030.html > > It's 5 years old; Google might find something more recent if > you can be bothered. I can't. > > Brian > > Joe Touch wrote: > >> I've come across the posts of many trolls, many of whom waste time. Is >> there some reason you believe Jeff Williams is more of a pseudonym >> than any of the other trolls? >> >> I.e., if you're going to make that accusation (of pseudonym), please >> include the reasons for the accusation. >> >> Joe >> >> Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> >>> Joe, >>> >>> Nobody has ever traced the person behind "Jeff Williams". I'm >>> surprised you haven't come across his or her output before. >>> I make no apology for attempting to prevent him or her >>> wasting our time, as he or she has wasted time of many other >>> IETF WGs in the past. >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> Joe Touch wrote: >>> >>>> Brian, >>>> >>>> If someone is posting under a pseudonym, please indicate who you >>>> believe the real author is and why. >>>> >>>> As to whether to reply, I would prefer that you let the WG decide >>>> that for themselves. Blackballing posters is an extreme measure, and >>>> shouldn't be done unless absolutely necessary. Besides, trolls are >>>> everywhere. >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's interesting that the person who writes under the pseudonym >>>>> "Jeff Williams" has start sending his or her usual nonsense to >>>>> the multi6 list. I advise everybody to not waste their time >>>>> reading messages from "Jeff Williams", and above *do not* >>>>> respond, because we know from experience that even more >>>>> nonsense comes back as a result. >>>>> >>>>> Brian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jeff Williams wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <blah blah blah>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 250 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA2frwE5f5cImnZrsRApu2AKDMHElAZP/dNI67pU+T0Jjd2fO5bgCg7J7A NUmsXcWt+JpgN+rKiV2CS6k= =DRJK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----