Re: identity persistence and comparison issues

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 24-jun-04, at 1:28, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> 
>> One could argue that the application should inform the "stack" about
>> the lifetime of the communication, perhaps by defining some new "open"
>> and "close" APIs, i.e. getting close to defining a session layer.
>> But my gut feel is that this requires more changes to the applications
>> than is warranted.
> 
> 
> Hm, I think you're overlooking the fact that in any case where referrals

In short, end systems can not be transparent to address (locator)
rewritings.

I guess that most people in the last interim meeting are so stupid
thay they couldn't have any chance to notice such a basic fact.

However, I'm still waiting fof the meeting minutes, even draft
ones, to confirm it was really so.

							Masataka Ohta