Re: identity persistence and comparison issues
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.multi6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> What if we just always show the application a long-lived identifier, > even though when it sets up a session we use ephemeral identifiers? That's part of what Jukka and I were pondering a bit. I think it is very interesting; just need to make sure that the additional local mapping on the host from the long-lived to the ephemeral doesn't introduce attacks that we don't know how to handle. > If > the application then doesn't do referrals there is no issue as the > long-lived identifier doesn't leave the host. If it does "contact me at > xxx" type referrals there is also no problem as xxx is the long-lived > identifier so the reference remains valid over (a reasonable amount of) > time. Only in the case of "you'll hear from me and I'm xxx" type > referrals wouldn't work, but those won't work reliably in the presence > of multiple addresses anyway. And if the long-lived ID is one of the locators we can provide compatbility for unmodified applications which do referrals and callbacks. Erik