Re: Engaging apps folks

Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-06-29, at 14.08, Erik Nordmark wrote:

> My experience, and I think Kurt said something similar, is that it
> is hard to engage application folks without something concrete like
> a proposal that they look at. This makes it tricky to get feedback 
> before
> we have nailed down enough of the approach to be able write down how it
> will affect applications, unless we do the work to present the apps 
> folks
> with a menu having different choices.

I think the other approach is for me and Brian (and perhaps David) to 
actually ask the Apps ADs for help. I think that we are fairly deep 
into the discussion on what properties what get's passed to the ULPs 
can have. In order to understand this better I think we need some input 
from Apps. But let's discuss this off-line and see what we can do. I 
have got some comments off-line from some apps people I know. I tried 
to convince them to join the mailinglist, but with not much success so 
far :-(

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQOPcHaarNKXTPFCVEQJngwCfckCd0m5ocNMUOLtbvIV6+uDJQP4AoNd+
/HsPp06Lq6Q/oFKJIRdzwoT4
=rpSo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.