Re: about Wedgelayer 3.5 / Fat IP approaches

>> It is actually more constrained than that since other instances of
>> the application might be running on non-multi6 aware hosts.
>> So the conservative approach would be to always hand an IP
>> address/locator
>> to unmodified applications, that way the application can use it
>> for callbacks and referrals without any constraints on which hosts the
>> different instances of the app is running.
>
> For a transition scenario this will most likely more be the rule than
> the exception. SIP comes to mind of an application where you would do
> referrals and you can not trust that all "nodes" are of the same
> "instance"/protocol version/awareness.
>

Does this implies that AID have to be routable IP addresses?

regards, marcelo

> - - kurtis -
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQA/AwUBQOPFuKarNKXTPFCVEQKT0QCg/eOifwbywPqBgcwcl0Kw2A5QZj8AoJFh
> Dk+jyIfwZcadamZqSRMvpF4S
> =y2oT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>