Question re HIP dependency [Re: about Wedgelayer 3.5 / Fat IP approaches]

Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Organization IBM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Some discussion on this thread refers to dependency on HIP.

Question to the WG: given the current state of HIP, do we
want to consider dependency on HIP as

a) acceptable
b) unacceptable?

   Brian (co-chair hat on)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.