Re: Question re HIP dependency [Re: about Wedgelayer 3.5 / Fat IP approaches]

Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.multi6
Organization None
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> Unless I'm mistaken HIP is still work in progress so that doesn't help. 

Is your intent to choose the multi6 protocol from only those
solution candidates which have already been defined and
completed? Please point me to the RFCs ;-)

--Jari
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.