Re: Question re HIP dependency [Re: about Wedgelayer 3.5 / Fat IP approaches]

Jari,

(This also responds to your other message.)

We're not voting on solutions; my question was about
dependencies. Building on an undeployed dependency is a serious
decision for any WG to take, especially one in the Operations
Area.

     Brian

Jari Arkko wrote:
> Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
>> Unless I'm mistaken HIP is still work in progress so that doesn't help. 
> 
> 
> Is your intent to choose the multi6 protocol from only those
> solution candidates which have already been defined and
> completed? Please point me to the RFCs ;-)
> 
> --Jari
>