Re: 2nd part Re: revision of architecture draft is now published

(still working through your comments...)

- in section 5.3.3

>when considering opportunistic identifiers to initiate the communication.
>note that non of the proposals AFAIK, use opportunistic identifiers for 
>the server side. imho this is very difficult, because, the client side 
>needs to know the identifier in order to initiate the communication. It 
>would be possible that the client side would select the servers identity 
>beforehand, but this may imply collisions if the server is already using 
>it. imho opportunistic ids are only suitable for clients (if any), but not 
>for servers.

Hi Marcelo,

I'm unsure of what you are saying here. Could you describe in a bit more 
detail the point so that I can understand what changes may be necessary for 
the draft?

thanks,

   Geoff