Re: Q2 Re: revision of architecture draft is now published

There's not been much response on this, so the Appendix is still
in the main draft for the moment. We will try to reach a consensus
on this point at the San Diego meeting.

     Brian

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> And here is the second question:
> 
> Do people think the Appendix to this draft, which is a preliminary
> analysis of various proposed approaches, should become a separate
> document? If the answer is yes, we have to discuss with our Area
> Director how this would fit into the WG charter.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> Geoff Huston wrote:
> 
>> draft-huston-multi6-architectures-01.txt has been published by the 
>> drafts editor. This version integrates comments made by working group 
>> members on the -00 version and also includes material proposed in the 
>> interim multi6 working group meeting earlier this month.
>>
>> I would like to propose to the chairs that the working group consider:
>>
>> - that this document be adopted as a working group document, and
>>
>> - that the appendix of this document be split off from the main text 
>> of the document and separately developed as a working group document.
>>
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>