Re: how much privacy do we need? (was Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers

Marcelo and all,

marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> El 09/07/2004, a las 12:20, Brian E Carpenter escribió:
>
> > marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> >
> >> Now, just to mix things a bit more, how would a solution
> > > like NOID support the privacy requirements? Are the DNS times
> > > compatible with this requirement?
> >
> > I'm not sure we have consensus that we even have a privacy goal,
>
> agree

  Whether there is a privacy goal or not, as much privacy that
can be achieved or realized should be effected.

>
>
> > except maybe the "do no harm" property compared to RFC 3041.
> >
>
> i personally agree with this goal, and i was just wondering how this
> could be achieved by NOID like solutions
>
> regards, marcelo
>
> >    Brian
> >

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email protected]
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827