Re: Question re HIP dependency [Re: about Wedgelayer 3.5 / Fat IP approaches]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Some discussion on this thread refers to dependency on HIP.
> 
> Question to the WG: given the current state of HIP, do we
> want to consider dependency on HIP as
> 
> a) acceptable
> b) unacceptable?
> 
>   Brian (co-chair hat on)
> 

There really wasn't much response to this one, but my reading of the
sparse consensus was against solutions that depend on the deployment
of HIP (but that does not exclude taking ideas or components of HIP).

    Brian